On 9 Feb 2007, at 11:27 am, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
Tim Cutts wrote:Package: courier-mta Version: 0.47-4sarge5 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Appendix F The prerm script of courier-mta does not remove two manpage alternatives. The following patch corrects the problem: --- courier-mta.prerm.orig 2007-02-09 10:24:09.896439231 +0000 +++ courier-mta.prerm 2007-02-09 10:27:47.419548587 +0000 @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ if [ "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" ]; then for binary in lockmail preline; do update-alternatives --remove $binary /usr/bin/$binary + update-alternatives --remove $binary.1 \ + /usr/share/man/man1/$binary.courier.1.gz done fiThank you very much for your patch. However, how do you justify the serious severity ? Appendix F says nothing about a "must".
I checked with the release managers on #debian-release (I wasn't sure myself, for precisely the reason you say) and was advised by Steve Langasek that it should be 'serious'
Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

