martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Why don't we simply drop a script into /etc/cron.hourly which sleeps
> for up to 60 minutes and then calls debsecan, 

I have no opinion about what the right approach is for the timing stuff.
But it seems to me as if this is a different issue, for sure not RC.
I'm not sure what you want to achieve with this double action (fixing a
bug and doing it in public).  If you want to show how to do an NMU, I
suggest not to touch the cron mechanism.

> using
> /etc/default/debsecan to determine the suite?
>
> That would solve the problems, no?

Yes, it seems so.  Florian has already suggested something like this.
If I were him, I would also read the mailto setting from
/etc/default/debsecan.  If I were you, I wouldn't make such an
unnecessary change in an NMU.  Oh, no, if I were you, I wouldn't
consider an NMU here at all.

I don't know Florians opinion about this, and he has the saying here.
But if you ask me, unless there's a particular reason why you choose
this bug (which I didn't read so far), I think it is a bad example for
your famous talk.  NMU work should be concentrated on RC bugs which are
hard to fix or which have not been addressed properly in the past.  A
bug that is two days old and already lead to a fruitful discussion
between the submitter and the maintainer does not need to be fixed in an
NMU.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

Reply via email to