Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:24:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> Which means someone needs to break this down to show what the testsuite
>>> failure is and why it fails.
>> As I really cannot reproduce it on several PowerPC subarchitectures
>> which I have access to, is it possible to get more information about
>> the buildd setup?
> I have no idea what information would be relevant.  The testsuite output is
> gnarly, and it's not clear to me which test suite failures here are fatal.
> For all I can see, the problem could be caused by trying to write to
> /root,

Nope, that's not it.

> or it could be caused by an altivec problem.  The first of these is
> definitely a bug in this package (it should be cleaned up to use a local
> home directory while building), the second could be any number of places,
> but a clearer picture of /what/ is failing seems necessary first.

I haven't been able to reproduce this problem *anywhere* and upstream
hasn't seen a report about a problem like this. I'll probably do another
gstreamer-perl upload to get more verbose output from this test, but the
test suite helpers in perl are really not helping when it comes to get
verbose error messages :-/

Marc
-- 
BOFH #397:
T-1's congested due to porn traffic to the news server.

Attachment: pgpsP3sSKHech.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to