On 3/13/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Hakan Ardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
> >> build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
> >> sourcecode.
> >For sure this would be better. (I just didn't dare try this.) I don't
> >know about the differences between the sources in gcc-4.1-source and in
> >gcc-avr, so I cannot judge whether this would be acceptable for etch.
> I see. Well it would mean moving from gcc 4.1.0 to 4.1.1, which is
> only a small upstream bugfix upgrade...
Nevertheless it's a significant rearchitecting of the package, so I'm not
sure we'd want to see such a change made at this point of the release cycle.
OTOH, I guess you'll know better than anyone if the resulting package works,
and it would reduce the amount of code we have to carry in the archive...
It's your call.
Well, the changes to the debian specific parts are minor: Just add the
build-depend and unpack the tar file from /usr/... instead of the
current directory. So I'll say we go with this solution.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
Håkan Ardö
