On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:53:46AM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > Steve, why did you reopen this bug?
Because the package is still unreleasable. > As I said in a previous message, this RFE is done What the heck is an 'RFE'? > and the request to remove ion3 should be made in a new report. This is > particularly important since the report is now excessively long. Uh, no. Who are you to decide that a bug is 'excessively long' and that a new one should be opened? Everything in this bug history is related to the same bug -- that upstream considers it unacceptable to include a frozen snapshot of ion3 in a stable release. > Unless you have a good reason, please close this report again and open a > new one. No, you don't get to demand that other people do extra work to satisfy some arbitrary and non-consensual aesthetic that you have regarding bug logs. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
