-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

>     [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/dbc
>     [starr] Compiling 65 source files to /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/dbc
>     [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/actors
>     [starr] Compiling 19 source files to 
> /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/actors
>     [starr] 
> /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/src/actors/scala/actors/JDK5Scheduler.scala:11 error: 
> value concurrent is not a member of package java.util
>     [starr] import java.util.concurrent.{ThreadPoolExecutor,
>     [starr]                 ^
>     [starr] one error found
> 
> BUILD FAILED
> /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/debian/simpbuild.xml:291: Compile failed with 1 
> error; see the compiler error output for details.

AFAIK java.util.concurrent library is JDK 1.5 feature.
I think your pbuilder installed kaffe or gcj instead of sun-j2sdk
to satisfy java-compiler and java-virtual-machine, but they
haven't supported its version yet.

Maintainer wrote a dependency as:
Build-Depends: sun-java5-jdk | java-compiler, java-gcj-compat-dev,  
sun-java5-jre | java-virtual-machine, ant,  debhelper (>= 5)

Hm, depending non-free-package from main-package seems very bad.

  Policy 2.2.1:
  main must not require a package outside of main for compilation or execution
  (thus, the package must not declare a "Depends", "Recommends", or
  Build-Depends" relationship on a non-main package),

Maintainer, did you build this pacakge with sun-java5-jdk?
I think it's better to move this package since 2.3.2 to contrib
section until gcj or other DFSG-free JDK support the 1.5 features.

Thanks,
- -- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAkYCMfIACgkQQKW+7XLQPLEXEACfR9q+5Z1C1Q/KWrpnFPh3PUbJ
lwQAn0YcHheMgChdi2tU+2+vz334tDWd
=f+BE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to