On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Philip Charles wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > > So I think we should continue to generate _correct_ Packages files for > > each CD, and solve the "signing issue" using some other method. > > I repeat my earlier suggestion. Sign md5sums.gz, this is supposed to be > the accuracy and security file. A script could be provided for the Insufficiant, and prone to the same problems AJ described. The Release signature covers the pre-scanned package meta data and that is important too. Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Anthony Towns
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Raphael Hertzog
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Raphael Hertzog
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Anthony Towns
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Raphael Hertzog
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Anthony Towns
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Raphael Hertzog
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure J.A. Bezemer
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Philip Charles
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Raphael Hertzog
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Philip Charles
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Anthony Towns
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Philip Charles
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Philip Charles
- Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure Anthony Towns