On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 10:58:28 +0800
"Lamer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my suggestion is
>
> binary-i386.iso (w/NON-US progees)
> binary-i386-us-exportable.iso (w/o NON-US progees)
>
> i think that the population outside US is bigger than US, moreover, we
> should consider US's policy as a kind of huh, exception policy, so that we
> can probably make 'US' exception and not 'non-US' exception.
>
>
Well, its not just the US that has restrictions on exporting software, lots of
countries have various restrictions on crypto, deCSS or mp3enc type software, so i
dont think the name "US" belongs in there.
As far as individual packages goes its more effecient for the servers to have a common
subset of packages that can be served from anywhere, then an extra bit that can added
can be served from the subset of servers that it is allowed to be, so the "bad" stuff
still needs to be able to be isolated.
With ISO's i think your names make sense.
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
