> I would appreciate any details about ISOLINUX 1.72 or later failing > where 1.67 succeeds. This is critically important, for obvious reasons.
Well, I don't have any, I just chose 1.67 following a conservative politic, after all at 1.70 you had made "Major code restructuring" so I didn't know how stable would 1.72 be. Besides, in the distro we are still at 1.66 version, I would have used this one but as 1.67 had a bugfix I chose that one. If you think that 1.72 works better than 1.67 let me know and if the other agree we'll change it. > 1.70 and .71 had serious, known, problems. That's why I didn't want to go for 1.72, maybe some unknown problems were still around, so I went conservative, that's all. Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
