On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Joey Hess wrote: > Many sites have old isos, or no isos, or a nonstandard directory > structure or filenames, earning a 0 in the "binary" column. And of > course a lot of mirrors don't have source.
hmm, i have been skipping most of this thread. what new isos ? i was under the impression (as of the last few years) that isos are generated once for a release and unless there are some exceptional circumstances are never regenerated without an increment of some kind. at ftp.au.debian.org, we generated the images using jigdo and then did a final sync against the "authoritative" images at cdimage.debian.org. we never check after that for various reasons o images are never supposed to change o there could be some problem at cdimage which would wipe out our local archive also so has there been some fundamental shift in the way debian is producing iso images - as evidenced by the very high number of sites below which get a 0 in the binary column ? regards, -jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
