Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:37AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hmmm. I'm not convinced by this one, either. It's a major decision to > change dependency ordering, and we expect dependency resolution to > work. What's the point of including packages in a task before all the > dependencies?
Current code do not check the prefered packages of task before adding a dependency so, for example: A task having: packageA packageB And the packages having: packageA depends packageC | packageB packageB Will result in: packageA packageC packageB After this patch, you'll end with: packageA packageB This can lead to a high size reduction on the produced CD and also makes sense since the packages on the list has preference to be include on the disc. That's why. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
