Hello Steve, Many thanks for that it worked perfectly.
I had actually tried putting source in the ARCHES line within build.sh before I had e-mailed the list, but like with the many early attempts with getting debian-cd to work it mysteriously failed. I am seriously wondering if it was the fact that I was lazy and used gnome terminal (as root) instead of doing it from a pure shell, though it shouldn't make any difference. I guess it is going to remain one of lifes mysteries as to why it did not work the first time. Now I just have to tweak it to make jigdo images. The really good thing about this is that during my tests I accidently worked out how to create multi-arch images. Once again thanks for the assistance in this. Regards, Christopher. On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 23:47 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:26:30AM +1300, Christopher Gregory wrote: > >Hello Everyone, > > > >Well for some unknown reason, debian-cd decided to work for me after my > >earlier post that the subversion build would not work. > > > >I now really would appreciate assistance as I can not find out from > >google nor the help file for debian-cd how I am meant to get it to > >produce dvd's of the source code. > > > >The build_all.sh script included with debian-cd says that it will build > >the sources, however after trying multiple times it only produces > >the .iso files for the binary packages. > > > >It is not listed anywhere in the CONF.sh file, though I have tried > >putting it there as an export like this: > > > > export SOURCE=1 ( which did not work) > >export INC_SOURCE=1 (also did not work) > >export INC_SOURCE=yes ( I found this in the Makefile, but also this did > >not work). > > "./build.sh source" > > should do what you need. Source is treated as (essentially) just > another architecture at the top level. Older versions treated source > specially, but not any more. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
