On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:50:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >How about just removing the directory for bittorent and any links to it >> > for oldstable? If we cannot seed the images and they unlikely to get >> > seeded much by others, should we really offer bittorent at all? >> > >> >Wouldn't it be better to just offer jigdo and the ISOs and be done with >> > it? >> >> Yup, I guess so. We should be able to handle the ISO/jigdo downloads >> directly from cdimage; bittorent is just adding overhead if there >> aren't a lot of users. Maswan - you may as well kill the bt stuff. > >OK. I'll remove the links from >http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ > >Who will remove the relevant directories from the mirrors: >http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/*/bt-*/ ? > >(And probably also for older oldstable releases?)
I'll clean up all the bt-* directories in the central archive/ directory, but I just want to check with maswan that that won't cause any problems for him. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Dasmohapatra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
