On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 06:32 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > Looks to me that the general state of builds is rather pathetic ATM: > > Sorry. I should have just written "Looks like there are quite a few > problems with builds ATM". Does not change the facts or the likelyhood of > a successful upload/release any time soon though.
I noticed the i386 failures yesterday. I've no idea when they started, seems like quite a while ago. Would it be worth having a notification of build failures sent to the list? (or even just an occasional summary) i386 is failing with: 3366 symbols, 654 unresolved Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/mklibs", line 538, in <module> raise "No library provides non-weak %s" % name No library provides non-weak _nss_files_parse_sg...@glibc_private@libc.so.6 make[2]: *** [stamps/tree-cdrom_gtk-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2 make: *** [build_cdrom_gtk] Error 2 I only checked the first failure for each arch but this same failure seems to have effected mips (build_r4k-ip22_cdrom), s390 (build_generic) and armel (uild_iop32x_netboot_glantank). The symbol in the mips case is "__gnu_local_gp" while the others are "_nss_files_parse_sg...@glibc_private@libc". I was unable to reproduce in an uptodate i386 sid chroot. I'm not sure which environment these builds occur, maybe it's a testing thing? I'm installing a squeeze VM now to check. powerpc is failing differently with E: Couldn't find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.30-1-powerpc-di or E: Couldn't find package floppy-modules-2.6.30-1-powerpc64-di depending on the flavour. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Q: Why did the astrophysicist order three hamburgers? A: Because he was hungry.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part