Humm, I see. I'll check the iso images again later this week. I'll post my findings then. Thanks! --Joao
On Monday, May 23, 2011, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:53:43PM +0100, João Antunes wrote: >>2011/5/23 Mattias Wadenstein <[email protected]>: >>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, João Antunes wrote: >>> >>>> I need to install Debian 3.0. However, the only source I could find >>>> apparently has corrupted iso images. >>>> I was using http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/ and I have >>>> tried three alternative ways to get the ISO: a) ISO image in 7 CD, b) >>>> ISO image in 1 DVD, and c) using jigdo to build an ISO image. >>>> >>>> The downloaded ISO images from methods a) and b) are corrupted (the >>>> sha1 hash is different, as some .deb files are corrupted). And using >>>> the c) approach doesn?t work either because jigdo fails to obtain >>>> some old packages? >>> >>> There isn't any sha1 hash published for 3.0 images, only md5. And as far as >>> I can see the md5s match MD5SUMS. >>> >>> /Mattias Wadenstein >>> >> >>The above ISOs (from cdimage.debian.org) fail during install due to >>some .deb packages being corrupted. >>Which link did you use? >>http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.0_r6/i386/iso-cd/MD5SUMS , >>for instance, is sha1. > > No. That's md5sums for the images, but signed using GPG. GPG is where > the "Hash: SHA1" bit comes from. As for the .debs being corrupted, do > you have any logs to show that. Woody's old (yes!), but those images > have worked in the past. > > Checking the checksums of the ISO files on the server in the directory > you mention, they all look OK. > > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] > You lock the door > And throw away the key > There's someone in my head but it's not me > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
