On 2015-11-16 15:59:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Regardless, I still think you should state the requirement in terms of > > the result, not in terms of how it's built. The "import image" thing was > > just an (arguably bad) example; but I can imagine other cases where > > things "have" to be built on the cloud provider's infrastructure, in the > > sense that for practical reasons it's the best way forward, but that it > > isn't theoretically the only possible way of doing so. > > > > In that light, I think a requirement that it be *possible* to build a > > bit-for-bit identical image while outside the given cloud infrastructure > > (even if for whatever practical reason we end up not doing so) makes > > much more sense. > > Then we do agree. That's what I wanted to write.
Yey, so we reached consensus in this at last :-) Build wherever you want just make it reproducible. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
