Le ven. 29 janv. 2016 à 17:33, Tiago Ilieve <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Hello fellows from Debian CD and Debian Cloud teams,
>
> As you may know, Oracle is interested on getting official Debian
> images on their cloud platform[1]. I've been working with them on this
> matter and now that we have a proper way to build those images using
> bootstrap-vz (the code is not yet on upstream, but is available on my
> fork[2]), we would like to do what is needed to call them "official".
> Emmanuel Kasper remembered[3] us of the guidelines for official
> images[4] and I talked with Steve McIntyre in private about this.
>
> Today, I took a few hours to read again the entire thread (and related
> off-thread messages) started by Martin Zobel-Helas[5] regarding Debian
> images on Azure, which brought the matter to our attention in the last
> November. Right now my main concern is: we need a custom kernel
> (compressed with gzip instead of xz), otherwise the instance will not
> be able to boot on the current version of Oracle Compute Cloud
> Service. This is a point that Brian Gupta cited on a pretty detailed
> message[6], in a reference to this 2013 thread[7], which states that
> in the need of a custom kernel on an official image, it should be
> built and maintained by Debian Developers. I'm not yet a DD, so that's
> why Ben Hutchings is cc'ed - maybe he can help us on what we can do
> about it.
>
> Another important point, brought up by Bastian Blank[8], is that
> Debian Machine Usage Policies[9] forbids usage of "Debian Facilities
> for private financial gain or for commercial purposes". I haven't
> charged Oracle for anything yet, but they are interested in paying
> someone to do this in the long-run. At the same time, both Raphael
> Hertzog[10] and Brian Gupta[11] remembered that many people are paid
> to work on Debian. So I'm a little bit lost regarding what part of
> Debian infrastructure can and cannot be used while being paid by third
> parties. For instance, if anyone updates a package on behalf of some
> company, is buildd usage accounted as "private usage for paid work"?
> The same would apply for an image built on Debian CD hardware?
>
> My 2 cents on this. While package is uploaded by a DD, this is a package
and nothing else, no matter if request or initial build was from a paid DD,
DM or sponsored user. If accepted in Debian, this is a package "like
others".

Using Debian servers, cloud credits should not used for different usage
than pure Debian like used for regular packages (computing for example)

Olivier

> By the end of the discussion, both Debian CD, Debian Cloud and Debian
> Trademark reached an agreement[12][13], where both "Debian", "Debian
> Cloud" or "Debian Jessie" names could be used by those images (as it
> has been used by images made for Amazon EC2), not mentioning
> "official". At the same time, the first item of the proposal[14] says
> that they will be considered "Official" Debian images. So I'm kinda
> confused about the usage of the word "official". Also, was there any
> discussions regarding the policy[15], to be draft from this proposal,
> that is expected to be finished by the release of Stretch? I haven't
> found any threads about this digging though the "debian-cd" and
> "debian-cloud" archives.
>
> Regards,
> Tiago.
>
> [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/08/msg00017.html
> [2]: https://github.com/myhro/bootstrap-vz/tree/oracle
> [3]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00018.html
> [4]: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/OfficialImages
> [5]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00005.html
> [6]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00016.html
> [7]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2013/04/msg00068.html
> [8]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00037.html
> [9]: https://www.debian.org/devel/dmup
> [10]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00047.html
> [11]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00063.html
> [12]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00086.html
> [13]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00088.html
> [14]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00093.html
> [15]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2015/11/msg00099.html
>
> --
> Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve
> Blog: https://blog.myhro.info/
> GitHub: https://github.com/myhro
> LinkedIn: https://br.linkedin.com/in/myhro
> Montes Claros - MG, Brasil
>
>

Reply via email to