Hi, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Should all be in place now - please shout if anything else appears to > be missing!
At the very end of my checks i notice that in https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/jigdo-dvd/SHA512SUMS there are no checksums for debian-update-9.4.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso debian-update-9.4.0-amd64-DVD-2.iso although there are sums for their .jigdo and .template files. This seems to be no copy+paste error because MD5SUMS, SHA1SUMS, and SHA256SUMS show the same lack. Not affected by this are: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/jigdo-bd/SHA512SUMS https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/jigdo-cd/SHA512SUMS https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/jigdo-dlbd/SHA512SUMS But all SHA512SUMS have checksums for MD5SUMS.jigdo, SHA1SUMS.jigdo, SHA256SUMS.jigdo, which are not offered for download, afaics. Not for SHA512SUMS.jigdo or the .template files. So this seems unintentional. Theory: MD5SUMS has no surplus .jigdo line, SHA1SUMS has MD5SUMS.jigdo, SHA256SUMS has MD5SUMS.jigdo and SHA1SUMS.jigdo. So it looks like the *SUMS producers saw .jigdo Files of the poorer *SUMS files which got produced earlier. Riddling is the fact that debian-cd produces .jigdo files as side effect of the xorriso run. But the *SUMS are not produced by xorriso. So where do the *SUMS.jigdo files come from on the first hand ? Have a nice day :) Thomas
