On 00-01-08 Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > elvis-tiny (1.4-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> > * Non-maintainer upload during bug-squashing-party.
> > * Recompilation with ncurses5.
> > * Fixed rules-file to work with /bin/ash.
> Yes, very nice and all, but this bug was only reported on Jan 5. Isn't
Oh, I didn't look at the date when a bug was reported but at the
severity.
> it normal procedure to give the package maintainer one week to solve
> the bug, then mail him to ask permission for NMU, and only after no
> answer actually do an NMU ?
Right, but I asked the people around in #debian-bugs how to handle NMUs
for fixing packages with RCBs and I only got told to look at the policy
section about how an NMU package should look. They told me nothing that
even while the bug-squashing party we use the normal way for NMUs. So
normally I would have choosen the way described above.
> I don't _really_ mind, but I have a elvis-tiny_1.4.-8 here ready to
> upload .. and the bug is only 2-3 days old ..
Oh, sorry for that.
Ciao
Christian
--
Wir neigen dazu, Erfolg eher nach der H�he unserer Geh�lter oder
nach der Gr�sse unserer Autos zu bestimmen als nach dem Grad
unserer Hilfsbereitschaft und dem Mass unserer Menschlichkeit.
(Martin Luther King 1929-1968)
