From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Where is freewnn-tserver? Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:02:35 +0900 (JST)
> maehara> And now I'd like to hear from more Chinese users, so discussing on > maehara> debian-chinese list (I'm not subscribed to it, so please always Cc: > me > maehara> if you post there) might be better. Then I'll consider tserver to be > maehara> invoked automatically or splitting freewnn-tserver from > maehara> freewnn-cserver. > > It is a good idea but not a serious matter. It is better not to annoy users with tiresome setup, isn't it :)? I'm still not sure whether it should be provided as separate packages or just one package which starts two servers and how /usr/bin/cWnn/* tools should be provided. Any comments are welcome. > BTW, cserver,jserver and kserver conflict with each other in potato > but they do not before. Does the upstream of FreeWnn change their policy? > It is inconvenient for someone want to use all of them. It was a bug (Bug#86615). Now it's fixed. -- Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- | This message was re-posted from [email protected] | and converted from gb2312 to big5 by an automatic gateway.
