> The more I read, the more I think this whole thing is just a big > misunderstanding. It seems that some people on cle list believe that > the evil glibc is trying to set an "official" locale name for TW. It's > NOT true. It's not glibc's business to go around telling people what > name they should use for their locales. Glibc simply follows the standards > and conventions. When in the situations where the standards are not explicit, > glibc has to try to accommodate the vagueness. That's exactly what it did in > 2.2 > for locale names, trying to accommodate the naming mess to support as many > locale names as possible. The name zh_TW (or zh_TW.big5) is glibc's internal > name. By NO means it imply that this should be TW's "official" locale name. > If you guys believe that you have gotten an "official" name in "zh_TW.Big5", > good, go on to promote it and enforce everyone using it. You will have no > problem with glibc 2.2.
glibc �� gtk �n normalized codeset ( charset ) ���M���L�̪��Ҷq [EMAIL PROTECTED], �����ij�j�a�� Big5 �O�]�� http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfc "��ij" codeset ( or charset ? ) �Τp�g [EMAIL PROTECTED], gtk �| normalized codeset �N�O�]�� mandrake Pablo ��ij��, ���G�{�b�S�� Big5 �u�O :-)
