On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 09:16:43PM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 08:38:55AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:10:24AM -0400, Thomas Chan wrote:
> > > But even Unicode 3.0 does not have HKSCS's 8AE3, 8B4D, 8B4E, nor 8B4F (but
> > > it does have 8B50 as U+95AA). I guess one can rank the "dirtyness" as:
> > > GB2312 < Big5 < {GBK, Unicode 3.0} < Big5HKSCS. :)
> >
> > that is why computer could enhance our lives. but it surely
> > depends on the standard writers' moral consciousness.
> > so, thanks gb2312. (i won't use gbk soon, lucky :)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@�ں١ABig5 HKSCS ����W�ɦr�Ŷ����ҥH���o��ʤf�r�A�O���F
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
> �Ǯժ֩w���|�гo�Ǧr�C :-) �ڥi��O�t����D�A�ڬ����ݹL
> HKSCS ���r���ɡA�N�O�䤣�X�̭����ʤf�r�C :-)
�����A�ΤF�ƻ�r���ɩO? �ڥΪ��رd�r�άO����... :p
--
Roger So telnet://e-fever.org
spacehunt at e-fever dot org SysOp, e-Fever BBS
GnuPG 1024D/98FAA0AD F2C3 4136 8FB1 7502 0C0C 01B1 0E59 37AC 98FA A0AD
