On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 06:22:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:26:44AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The commerical GB18030 font is available now. But I use ISO10646-1 font
> > instead. Because the GB18030 is indeed a variant of Unicode, like UTF-8.
> >
>
> Oh, yes. Since GB18030 is supposed to be totally compatible
> with iso10646, those iso10646 that covered full range of unicode
iso10646 fonts
> code point ( or BMP for now?) should be enough.
Hmmm... It said GB18030 added 7000 more characters than the iso10646's
BMP. So iso10646 fonts won't do the work.
And those 40000 more Unicode 3.1 hanzi... I cannot recognize 1% in
the extension. Damn!
--
Best regard
hashao
--
| This message was re-posted from [email protected]
| and converted from gb2312 to big5 by an automatic gateway.
