I think zh_CN.GB2312 is ok, because it has contained enough information. GB2312/GBK is implied.
This issue has been brought up in KDE I18N zh_CN team. I feel that zh_CN.GB2312 is really ugly. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 12:12 AM Subject: [i18n-chinese] zh_CN or zh_CN.GB2312 ?? > hi, > > i happened to notice that in /etc/gtk/ (debian woody helix-gnome) > there is only gtkrc.zh_CN (by pablo from mandrake) but no zh_CN.GB2312, > > i suspect this should be changed? please advice. thanks. > > (the reason is that seems lots of packages/subsystem cannot > agree with the locale names, like in current xemacs 21.1 + mule, > and other places, ... which well just got me on the code i'm now > writint... :( > 。RP?�Dzf??y??b? ?猼蝚趁炮ぷn&坎??Z脫緉玕~濇劂 ?滆?nW?{Zr摡紱?蚴?-斜?抵?- | This message was re-posted from [email protected] | and converted from gb2312 to big5 by an automatic gateway.
