I can't input Chinese in diagram edit window of dia too, but I can input in properties editor box. And Chinese charactor can display correctly in diagram edit window.
I don't think this is a configuration problem, maybe the dia should be patched before you can input Chinese in the diagram edit window. * Yao Heling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 15:49:06 +0800]: > My debian configuration is almost the same as yours as I apt-get udpate > pretty frequently. > > I tried to export locale to gbk or utf-8 respectively, so that the > outputs from "locale" indicate everything is zh_CN.gbk or zh_CN.UTF-8; > but neither works. The symptom is that I simply cann't activate XIM once > in dia (of course I've tried various fonts such as SimSun, Arphic-Kaiti > etc); I chose to insert some text, and it worked as long as I entered > English characters, but when I pressed Ctrl + space, nothing happens? > > So I have two questions: > 1. Is there anything special to be done before using dia with simplified > chinese? (as it's a gtk2 program, I don't think so; and I can use > chinese with other gtk2 based programs) > > 2. What's the possible cause for my problem? > > I really appreciate any help/comments. > > > Yao Heling > > > 在2004年03月04日的04:34，Ming Hua写道： > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:42:42AM +0800, Yao Heling wrote: > > > I'm using Dia 0.92.2-3 on debian/unstable. I find it impossible to input > > > chinese into dia. I remember I could input chinese in the past, but the > > > font sizes were huge. Does the current version of dia support chinese at > > > all? > > > > I am using the same Dia version in sid, and it works fine here. Are you > > sure you have been in the correct locale (LC_CTYPE), and have chosen a > > valid Chinese font? > > > > For the record: > > kernel 2.4.25-1-k7 > > XFree86 4.3.0-2 (using freetype module, without xfs) > > FreeType 2.1.7-2 > > Dia 0.92.2-3 > > > > Hope this helps, > > Ming > > 2004.03.03 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > We used to think that if we know one, we know two, because one and one are > > two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about ``and''. > > --- Sir Arthur Eddington > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
