Le Wed, May 06, 2026 at 10:32:33PM +0000, [email protected] a écrit : > I notice two small cli-common remnants still present in ds2-2 that may be > intentional - want to check: cli-common-dev in Build-Depends and the > update-alternatives call for cli-gacutil in mono-runtime.postinst/prerm. > My current ds2-3 commit is adoption-only and does not touch either. Would > you like me to fold that cleanup into ds2-3 to give the upload a bit more > substance, or would you prefer to keep ds2-3 minimal and defer it to > ds2-4? > (…) > My current ds2-3 commit is: sole Maintainer field, DM-Upload-Allowed: > yes, Standards-Version 4.7.4, a gbp.conf encoding the branch/tag > conventions, and Closes: #1133397 in the changelog. Lintian is clean. > I was planning to push it to a feature branch > (james/adopt-mono-6.14.1+ds2-3) for your review before anything touches > debian/unstable. If you would prefer I push directly to debian/unstable, > or have a different workflow preference, just say so. > (…) > Since I do not yet have upload rights I will still need sponsorship for > the actual upload. If you are willing to review and sponsor 6.14.1+ds2-3 > I would be grateful. If you would rather point me toward another DD that > is equally fine.
A minimal ds2-3 update is something I could upload quickly (even today), and would give a signal that the package is no longer orphaned. Please send it directly to the debian/unstable branch, we do not need to bother with extra branches since it’s only the two of us working on that repository. I can not promise anything with 6.14.1+ds2-4 and later, but feel free to ask me anyway. > Noted. Could update wiki.debian.org/Teams/Mono to reflect solo > maintenance. The Vcs-* fields in debian/control still point to > salsa.debian.org/dotnet-team/mono, which *should* be fine since > the repository is real; it is just the "team" framing that would > need correcting in the wiki. If you have an account on wiki.debian.org, you can consider that the Teams/Mono page is now your own ;) I kept it in the Teams namespace for two reasons, maybe they still make sense: - so old links on the Web would still direct to the up-to-data wiki page - in the hope that people would join me and resurrect an actual team "One person team" is actually a quite common concept in Debian, but it probably needs to be explicit to temper user (and upstream) expectations.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
