Hello, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:24 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau <[email protected]> wrote: > As you point out, it was already the case for the old list. I think > (contrary to the Python Team) the level of mails was acceptable, but > that's a very personal thing.
Whilst the number of packages we have in the team is low atm, it doesn't mean they won't (or can't) increase with time? :) > > I'd rather prefer having a Clojure team on tracker.d.o and using > > [email protected] as the Python team does. Or > > alternatively, not have a new re-direction and use the older Clojure > > list for that purpose. But that's just a suggestion. > > I don't feel there's any downsides of using > [email protected] as a maintainer contact. If people want > to subscribe to it they can, and it does make the main list "cleaner". Lovely, we have an agreement here! \o/ Let's go for this one unless somebody objects?
