> AFAIU from discussions thus far, that is indeed the case for the AWS images. > Is that correct? Yes sir. Everything on the images is installed from the main debian repos, no monkeybusiness.
Anders On 11 November 2012 16:36, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:39:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> > 4) CLI tools - not initially here. There's lots to discuss with >> > regards to packages of it; who should maintain it, what is the >> > copyright, and where should the repo be. I would love to, but I >> > don't have answers for those questions right now. >> >> They are non-free, so I think that we should not have them by default. > > Strong ACK. > > I feel pretty strongly about the fact that, to advertise official Debian > images of *any* public cloud out there 1/ they shall only contain > DFSG-free software by default, and 2/ we should be able to create them > using only DFSG-free software. > > AFAIU from discussions thus far, that is indeed the case for the AWS > images. Is that correct? > > OTOH I'm not sure that is the case for the Azure images, as of yet? > Pierre? > > Cheers. > -- > Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o > Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o > Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . > « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/camcogxfdgyjrzp+_g0vrsz3zfp4beiit0wxbam_rtshsqbg...@mail.gmail.com
