Hideki Yamane <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > I've installed ubuntu on azure, and checked waagent package source to > find something to add/improve debian package. > > > * debian/control >>Package: walinuxagent > > Ubuntu specifies its package name as "waalinuxagent", should we name it > as same or not? However, Ubuntu package failed to make ensure smooth
sounds like a typo to me. The github project is walinuxagent for windows azure linux agent. I don't see what could be the extra 'a' (windows azure agent linux agent ?) > upgrade and adds walinuxagent-data-saver to fix, maybe different name > is better. > > > * debian/copyright >> Files: waaagent >> Copyright: 2012, Microsoft Corporation <[email protected]> >> 2012, Ben Howard <[email protected]> >> License: Apache-2.0 > > Well, which is correct - only Microsoft or with canonical? iirc, there are changes in the ubuntu package for things like upstart so I guess the packager added the Canonical line. Of course, this is pure guess so I can be wrong. > > > * debian/upstart,default,patches/000_use_package_upstart.patch > > It has upstart job and disabled upstream upstart functions. > Maybe debian should include those for upstart. afaik, there's a pull request for that on github, so it'll come for free sooner or later. > > And interesting thing, it calls modprobe to add udf to blacklist. > > #Load the udf module > modprobe -b udf sounds weird. Any idea why ? Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
