On 04/20/2013 01:59 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > If the backport is accepted, it may be interesting to mention it in promotion > documents, otherwise, my personal opinion is to stick to the facts (there is > currently no backport) rather than make promises (there will be backports), > even if they are easy to keep. I fully agree. I had too many of such disappointments in Debian in the past, that I too, think it's very risky to try to predict the future.
Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
