On 27 January 2014 19:18, Alistair Prestidge < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi. The 7.3 ami's are now in the market place which is great. Ive been > upgrading to them all weekend. Thanks for all the hard work. > > Sorry to ask this again but I would really like to use instance store > backed ami's rather than ebs for the root device. > Should I be asking this question somewhere else? > Is this something that is going to be supported? > Is there a reason they have not yet beem generated? > or am I just looking in the wrong places for them? > > Regards > > Alistair > On 22 Jan 2014 07:46, "Alistair Prestidge" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Brilliant. Thanks. Do you know if that will include instance store backed >> ami's as well as EBS? >> On 21 Jan 2014 21:00, "Bromberger, James" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's on its way. Should be visible in the next day or so from what I >>> understand. >>> >>> James >>> >>> -- >>> I'm on a phone; the typos are due to a ridiculously small keyboard! If >>> the above is unclear or hilarious then please call me on +61 422 166 708. >>> :) >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> *From:* Alistair Prestidge [[email protected]] >>> *Received:* Tuesday, 21 Jan 2014, 12:06 >>> *To:* [email protected] [[email protected]] >>> *Subject:* Debian 7.3 ami >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I was wondering where the 7.3 ami had got to? They do not appear to be >>> in the aws marketplace yet but was apparently submitted. >>> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2013/12/msg00023.html >>> >>> Also are there going to be any instance store ami's for 7.3. There are >>> none listed here. >>> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/Cloud/AmazonEC2Image/Wheezy#A7.3 >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> Woops, and once more for the list as well :-) --- There aren't any official ones, but you can bootstrap S3 AMIs yourself if you'd like. It's dead easy, just use the S3 example manifest<https://github.com/andsens/build-debian-cloud/blob/python/manifests/ec2-s3.manifest.json> as a starting point. -- Also, to answer your other questions: > Should I be asking this question somewhere else? No, this is the right place > Is this something that is going to be supported? James is the man to answer that question. > Is there a reason they have not yet beem generated? Mostly a matter of what was chosen to focus on, I think :-)
