Anders, I do agree with you: the development branch is pretty stable for merging. But for 1.0, we should also take care of problems regarding squeeze (something that I hadn't time to look at, as in the last weeks I'm working in a more-than-full-time job), besides this one related to our never ending battle against VirtualBox Guest Additions.
Regards, Tiago. On Aug 8, 2014 9:59 PM, "Anders Ingemann" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 August 2014 01:43, Marcin Kulisz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2014-08-06 22:32:45, Tiago Ilieve wrote: >> > Marcin, >> > >> > I know it's a bit of a pain to backport fixes like this, but at the same >> > time, we can't just don't care about it to the point of nearly ditch one >> > of the two architecures that bootstrap-vz supports. Also, take care of >> > issues like this is one of the perks of being a package mantainer. >> >> Hi Tiago, >> for one bootstrap-vz doesn't support those yet as this patch is only >> available >> in development branch. >> Two, are there (in the wild) people who really are using i386 in >> environments >> like this? If they are I suppose it's very small niche. >> >> As I already explained it's very small patch and I don't mind attaching >> it, it >> just made me start to look up stats for i386 usage on virtualised envs >> we're >> targeting with bootstrap-vz and it seams to be marginal. >> >> >> >> On 2014-08-06 22:17:28, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >> > I intend to use i386 for testing PyOpenCL, but as for now we cannot >> > run Debian on GPU instances, it is not worth worrying about. >> >> Seams to be additional point to include this patch, so I'll do. Patches >> from >> both GH PRs (118 & 119) will be included in 0.9.0-2 (or 1.0.0 *blink*) >> >> > More important question should be answered by Andreas - when >> > you'll merge development branch into master. And - is there >> > any timeline for 1.0? >> >> +1 Tomasz >> >> It'll be nice to have it in Jessie and as freeze is coming soon, thx a >> lot to >> Balint for uploading current version (0.9.0), so we can later fast track >> (not >> going through new) 1.0.0 when released. >> -- >> >> |_|0|_| | >> |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | >> |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | >> >> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 >> 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3 >> > > > More important question should be answered by Andreas - when > > you'll merge development branch into master. And - is there > > any timeline for 1.0? > > My wish would be to get most of the different boot methods working for EC2 > first (some don*t work if you hadn't noticed) and figuring out the problem > with installing VirtualBox GuestAdditions when the target and host kernel > differ. The latter will probably be fixed soon, while the former might need > the testing framework I'm currently developing to allow for iterating > through different adjustments/fixes quickly. > > Save all of the above, I believe the current dev branch is rather stable, > though I have not had the chance to test properly in quite a while. > > Tiago, any thoughts on merging? > > Anders >
