On 24 April 2015 at 17:28, Olivier Berger < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi. > > Emmanuel Kasper <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > My approach is similar to yours except I am using packer at the momment, > > which I found very reliable as it builds VM images using the > > debian-installer and a preseed file, leveraging on tons of QA done there > > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740753 for the RFP) > > Now I know the consensus on the list is to use bootstrap-vz and I am > > fine with that. > > > > Am I right in saying that packer brings in the main benefit of not > setting a fixed size for the disks, which is problematic with > bootstrap-vz (as Jan experienced) ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best regards, > -- > Olivier BERGER > http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: > 2048R/5819D7E8 > Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF > Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > > Am I right in saying that packer brings in the main benefit of not > setting a fixed size for the disks, which is problematic with > bootstrap-vz (as Jan experienced) ? Could you elaborate on that? I'd be very interested in how to do that for bootstrap-vz if it is possible. Anders
