On 1 May 2015 at 16:39, Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:41:33PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > > > As for docker, lxc, kvm, for sure we want to have them ! But note that > > > without plugins vagrant has only support for docker among those. > > > > Correct and I think that docker plus kvm should be enough in most cases. > > I use vagrant with lxc on a daily bases and have my hacky scripts to > build images: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/terceiro/vagrant-lxc-images.git > > of course you cannot compare sizes of lxc images against virtualbox > ones, but the last jessie image I built was just 78MB (base system > only, no chef/puppet/etc). > > I even started packaging vagrant-lxc but we are not there yet because > it's not easy to make vagrant support externally-packaged plugins yet: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740164 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740165 > > at some point I will probably try to chime in the work you guys are > doing so we also have lxc vagrant images (of course if someone wants to > beat me to it I will be very happy ;-)) > > -- > Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> > I am thinking about creating a docker/rocket provider for bootstrap-vz, I believe a lot of the code between that provider and an lxc provider could be shared, right? Anders
