On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:15 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I finally got around to push an initial version of bootstrap-vz > >> configs > >> for vanilla debian boxes to be uploaded to hashicorp's atlas. > >> > >> There's no config management software contained - did we come to a > >> conclusion re that subject yet? > >> There were differing POVs if we should include CM software or just > >> tell > >> the user how to install it. > >> > >> To keep the boxes as small as possible and because some CM software > >> might not be DFSG comliant, I vote for the 2nd possibility: > >> Tell the user how to install it, but don't include it. > >> > >> Jan > > > > Sounds great Jan! I'll be expecting a PR with the addition of an > > official vagrant manifest then :-) > > > > Regarding the CM. I think we talked about modifying the bundled > > Vagrantfile to install the desired CM on boot. You could then create a > > few flavors using the exact same box. Or maybe I misunderstood that > > part, but that is what I would find useful I think. > > Hi Jan, > Looking forward to git pull. Did you push your work on Alioth ? > > It seems most people who wrote on > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787298, and according > to what I heard on the Vagrant user group, most people prefer a base box > without provisionners. > > Actually adding a provisionner to the base box is just a matter of > adding: > > config.vm.provision "shell", > inline: "sudo apt-get --yes install cfengine3" > > inside the config block of the Vagrantfile > > @anders: is the 0.95 release enough to build vagrant boxes ? It would > make sense to use a stable release of bootstrap-vz if possible, so we > could switch to the packaged version of bootstrap-vz in the mid term. > We would then be able to create Vagrant base boxes using only software > available in Debian. > > Emmanuel > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > > is the 0.95 release enough to build vagrant boxes
Yes it is. The only thing we need before calling it 1.0 is James' fixes for ec2, I don't think any of those affect virtualbox. Besides, the virtualbox images have been integration tested with various combinations of bootloader, partitioning strategy and release :-) -- Anders Ingemann
