Your message dated Sat, 29 Jul 2023 13:50:40 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1042367: bookworm cloud images missing since 20230725
(only backports images)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1042367,
regarding bookworm cloud images missing since 20230725 (only backports images)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1042367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042367
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cloud.debian.org
Until https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bookworm/daily/20230724-1451/ we
still had debian-12-{azure,ec2,generic,...}. But in
https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bookworm/daily/20230725-1452/ and also
https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bookworm/daily/20230726-1453/ there are
only debian-12-backports-* variants.
We could adjust our scripts for the renaming, but this smells like a bug --
it may be nice to have cloud images with some/all backports enabled, but can we
also have the "pure bullseye" images back?
Thank you!
Martin
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Bastian,
Bastian Blank [2023-07-27 18:45 +0200]:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 06:44:56AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > We could adjust our scripts for the renaming, but this smells like a bug --
> > it may be nice to have cloud images with some/all backports enabled, but
> > can we
> > also have the "pure bullseye" images back?
>
> Yeah, that's broken. I mixed up names in the config.
https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bookworm/daily/20230729-1456/ is happy
again.
Thanks for fixing!
Martin
--- End Message ---
