> Raul> Also, note that we need to address all the problems with our proposed > Raul> strategy.
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 10:49:38PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > In which case, really, we should advice that a major upgrade > to slink be made with the updated versions of man, dwww, info, and > any other packages that use /usr/share/doc, /usr/share/man, or > /usr/share/info. The release notes for potato will recommend that anyone > using a package from unstable first upgrade to the updated stable. This doesn't have to be an upgrade to slink. This can be a dummy package in potato which conflicts with the slink versions. The release notes would then recommend that this dummy package be installed. > Raul> At the moment I'm far more concerned about our other three > Raul> members. I'm not sure if I should wait for them to comment > Raul> and/or vote. > > Umm, we should be able to function even if some members are > otherwise engaged (heck -- my vacation trips to India mean I'd be out > for a month at a time) > > The minimum Quorum requirements have been met. And some of the > members are definitely around (they voted for the chairperson). Sure, quorum is 2. But without a majority any vote takes a week. > I'd say that we may send them personal mail asking them to > participate, but we should not draw this out much further. Dale had indicated that he'd do this for me. But that was several days ago -- perhaps it's time to do it again. -- Raul
