On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:05:17 -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 04:53:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=sarge-ignore That is not exhaustive; make and Gnus are not on that list (because I closed the gfdl bugs, that was before I educated myself on the gfdl). > [2] I think the right course for the committee to take in this case > is offering advice. On the one side, I can offer my earlier > suggestion (posted to debian-vote): [SNIP] > Maybe there's some improvements that coud be made on that > suggestion? I understand that such a proposal is making its way through a select group of people, and shall emerge on -vote shortly (no, I am not involved). > I've been looking for other alternatives, and if there are any good > ones I'm not seeing them. Me neither. I suggest we go along with the above, perhaps stopping short of specifying the exact language of the GR being advocated. manoj -- "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away". Philip K. Dick Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
