severity 270506 wishlist reassign 270506 tech-ctte merge 270506 266762 thanks
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 08:33:03PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> reassign 270506 pvm > Bug#270506: rpvm_0.6.2-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib > Bug reassigned from package `rpvm' to `pvm'. Please, this makes no sense anymore. The tech-ctte has not yet reached its conclusion (at least not via a formal vote), but the three people (out of seven) who have said anything seem to agree quite clearly with me: I wrote: >>> The entire discussion here is whether #266762 is wishlist or not. I claim it >>> is; the rpvm people claim it is serious. Raul Miller replied: >> It's a serious bug for rpvm, it's a wishlist bug for pvm. Manoj Srivastava replied: > This is my take on it as well. Also, Bdale Garbee wrote: > - #266837 should not have been reassigned. It should remain open against > rpvm at priority important until the package succesfully builds on the > rest of Debian's architectures. > > - #266762 et al remain open at whatever priority the pvm maintainer wants, > wishlist is certainly within their rights. Given that you'll need 4:1 majority in the tech-ctte to overrule me on bugs against pvm (as I am the pvm package maintainer), and three out of seven (the other four are still silent) seem to agree that I can let 266762 be wishlist, could we please stop playing BTS-pingpong and get on with releasing sarge? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
