Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> writes: > I don't think infeasible or unconstructive are the best qualifiers. > Unconstructive discussions are not necessarily bad since they can easily > be ignored. I'm hard pressed to come up with an infeasible case (except > perhaps when one does not have the ability to send mail over the > internet).
Counterproductive, perhaps? That's the best word that I can come up with to capture my concern, which is that forcing some of these discussions to be public would make the underlying problem considerably worse. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
