On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Wouter Verhelst > > > Yes, absense of documentation is common on Unix and Linux systems; but > > no, I do not think that this is okay, or that we should in any way > > encourage that sort of thing. > > By absense of documentation, are you referring to the almost 10% of the > source base that are comments or the 15% that is DocBook XML based > documentation? (Almost 14kLOC and almost 36kLOX, respectively.) Actually, in this case more documentation is on the wiki, so not included in those statistics :)
1. Multi-Seat on Linux http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat 2. logind D-Bus API Documentation http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/logind 3. Inhibitor Lock Developer Documentation http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/inhibit (and the manpages actually generated from DocBook) 4. http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/logind.conf.html http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/pam_systemd.html http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-logind.html Yeah, the documentation could be more complete, but it's hardly "absent". Zbyszek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
