On Thu, 07 Nov 2013, Rogério Brito wrote: > On 2013-11-07 11:03, Ian Jackson wrote: > (...) > > Option Packard: > > > > 3. We propose to the DPL that Keith Packard should be appointed > > to the TC. (Constitution 6.2(2)) > > Sorry if I missed anything, but shouldn't messages by the TC on decisions and > announcements be signed?
We generally sign announcements, but that's primarily because they have to be sent to -announce. > As an inferior Debian citizen (only a lowly Debian Maintainer, after all), I > would certainly expect this to be the case. No, they are not required to be signed. [There aren't very many of us on the CTTE, so it would be very easy to spot a forgery.] -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something. -- Steven Wright -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
