Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> writes: > The "holding back upstream packages" would only be true for Linux-only > software that additionally chooses to drop the non-kdbus codepaths.
> As I already explained, software like glib2.0 and libdbus that supports > non-Linux kernels will anyway have to continue to support non-kdbus > systems forever. > Is there actually any implementation other than glib2.0 and libdbus that > would be affected by a switch to kdbus? This is an interesting question. Josselin, is GNOME (for example) likely to acquire a hard dependency on kdbus through some mechanism? I don't understand the plumbing of this stuff well enough to know where the dependencies could surface. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
