Hi Colin, Le mercredi 01 janvier 2014 à 17:17 +0000, Colin Watson a écrit : > > > Basically, systemd would be more compelling to me if it tried to do > > > less. I don't expect to persuade systemd advocates of this, as I think > > > it amounts to different basic views of the world, but the basic approach > > > here is probably the single biggest factor influencing my position.
> I'm referring to features that I don't think we'll need, not to logind > et al. Could you list the features you don’t think we’ll need in the list from the wiki? * Reliable service management through cgroups * Logging features * Multi-seat * Defense-in-depth security features * Centralized service startup and monitoring * timedated/hostnamed/… * D-Bus API for service control * Transparent virtual environment support * Watchdog * Initramfs support * Introspection and debugging * Configuration-less system * User sessions I’m curious as to what features you consider not relevant for Debian. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1388655231.7783.467.camel@dsp0698014