Ansgar Burchardt <[email protected]> writes: > Sometimes I also wonder if a GR might be a better way to deal with the > decision as this feels more and more like an "political" or "opinion" > decision rather then a technical decision to me as tech-ctte members > have found both upstart and systemd to be suitable so far and only minor > reasons were responsible for the final decision.
For what it's worth, I actually disagree with this. I believe upstart is technically unsuitable to be Debian's init system. Now, the upstart maintainers are committing to implement a whole bunch of new functionality in upstart to *make* it suitable if we adopt it, so that's a situation that could change. But, at the present time, I think upstart is clearly technically inferior to systemd, and not in just minor ways. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
