Nikolaus Rath writes ("Re: Bug#727708: loose ends for init system decision"):
> For example, a hypothetical future program to interactively adjust
> program cgroups cannot be sysvinit compatible in any meaningful sense,
> because it does not need to be supervised, started, or stopped. However,
> this program would depend on the cgroups API offered by systemd. So this
> program would not be allowed in Debian, unless its maintainer adds
> support for whatever cgroups managed we would eventually use with upstart?I would hope that we can standardise on a single API to the system's single cgroup writer. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
