Uoti Urpala writes ("Bug#727708: init system discussion status"):
> There are two different kinds of dependencies: dependencies expressed in
> package metadata, and functional dependencies (as in whether the package
> does anything useful with another init). Your earlier wording sounds
> like it was talking about the former ("installable") and Ian's proposal
> definitely was (explicitly mentioning package fields), but the "fully
> working" you use now sounds like it's about the latter.Thanks for pointing this out. My proposal is too weak in this respect. I intended to make the stronger statement. > As the systemd-ui example shows, [...] I think systemd-ui is part of the systemd init system so falls into the exception. Of course that means that nothing else should depend (functionally or in package dependencies) on it. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
