On 15/01/14 21:48, Russ Allbery wrote: > If OpenRC proves to be of broad interest and becomes supported, at least > at the non-default level, I doubt we would continue to support sysv > without OpenRC for very long [...] the upgrade path from > sysvinit only to sysvinit with OpenRC should be fairly smooth.
I do hope for something like this. Continuing to support SysV doesn't have to be a requirement. A comfortable transition away from SysV initscripts is possible, as long as native init definitions are provided for the official init system[s], and for whatever the ports have. (That's also why GNU/kFreeBSD and Hurd ought to pick the same). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
