On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff dixit: > >>FreeBSD upstream isn't a desktop OS and never will be, there're just too >>many deficiencies (e.g. lack of dbus > > Eh, excuse me! It’s obviously possible to run a desktop without dbus! > In fact, this is a feature, in my eyes.
I think Moritz's point is that the project should get to the point where it is perceived as ok for the non-linux ports to lose things like gnome once it entirely depends on linux-only features (lots of alternative desktops xfce, lxde, etc. still of course remain). To make that ok, the % build requirement for kfreebsd/hurd will probably need to be reduced. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MNL62cSDSXho15-F2DV1ombWDfRLEm�[email protected]
