Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?"):
> In this case I suggest to decide just the question of the default init
> system on Linux architectures first and address further details later if
> no consensus can be found elsewhere. Finding the correct wording then
> should be easier.I strongly object to this approach for the reasons I have given already. If I am given the opportunity to do so, if such a resolution is proposed I will always propose amendments to settle the T vs L question. If I am not given the opportunity to do so, that would be because someone proposes a set of options which do not answer the tying question, and immediately calls for a vote. Under the circumstances that would be IMO a clear breach of process. I hope that now that I have made this perfectly clear, that this will not happen. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
